e-mail me
HomeVideoSupport Our AppealThe Gay AgendaMedical FactsLund's DefamationHow it all began...The Letter in QuestionCase OverviewHR ViolationsOpen CommentBlogLinksContact

Donate to the Stephen Boissoin defence fund.  Help fight the HRC.

      

 "Donations to this cause are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes." 

 

 


- Canada's Human Rights Commissions a Threat to Academic Freedom: US Academic Elites. OTTAWA (LifeSiteNews.com) - Canada is a "problematic" destination for a conference on political thought because of the predilection of its Human Rights Commissions (HRC) for squashing freedom of expression says a number of American intellectuals.     Read more here.
- Kangaroo Canada
  by Douglas Farrow, associate professor of Christian Thought at McGill University.    "Boissoin can appeal, but many appeals are not heard and many others are never made for the simple reason that the appellant cannot afford it. And in the absence of a successful appeal, the remedies of the kangaroo courts are enforceable by the criminal courts, and the prospect of jail awaits anyone who refuses to comply. Nor do those who escape conviction escape punishment. The process itself, as Steyn points out, is a punishment. The complainant is liable for nothing, not even the cost of a lawyer, while the accused is liable for everything."     
                                                                                                                                    
Read more here.
What's the Matter With Canada?
by Chuck Colson

"In the name of tolerance—or of someone’s twisted idea of that concept—we have to protect everyone’s sensitivities. Nobody can say anything that might make someone feel like a victim of hatred and contempt. And thus we back into a soft despotism, which suppresses free speech and eradicates religious freedom. Where is this going to end? Will it become a crime even to be a Christian in Canada?"             Read it here.


- The Appeal has been filed with the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta.       Read it here.
- Human Rights Commission advises that Edmonton church should obtain legal consent and Police approval for an "in house" Biblical presentation.            Read it here.
- HIV Rate Up 12% Among Young Gay Men - Steepest Rise Is in Black Males Ages 13 to 24   (Washington Post Story - June 27, 2008) The study found that homosexual men were the only risk group in which the number of new infections rose annually from 2001 through 2006. (Epidemiologists prefer the term "men who have sex with men," or MSM, because many of them do not identify themselves as homosexual or gay.) In contrast, injecting-drug users, homosexual men who injected drugs, and heterosexuals each showed declines in new infections over that period.                                                                  Read it here.

- Calgary's Bishop Henry Calls on Premier to Curtail Powers of Human Rights Commissions (LifeSiteNews.com)  In a letter to Premier Stelmach, Bishop Henry points out that in the past 18 months he has raised the issue of the Alberta Human Rights Commission (AHRC) several times with the Premier. "On each of those occasions, you said that you understood the issues and shared my concerns."   "However," he continues, "the situation is continuing to deteriorate across our country and the various levels of governments are seemingly non-responsive."                                                                                           Read it here.
- Big pat on the back for Ezra Levant!!!  "The Boissoin case may be blossoming into the most prominent of the conflicts between Christians and gay activists, partly because Levant has been so successful in harping on the story and spreading it. Having shown little concern about the national anti-free-speech apparatus for years, the Canadian public is beginning to notice."  — John Leo, National Review  is a Manhattan Institute senior fellow and a contributing editor at City journal."                                                                                                        Read it here.
- "Gay" Sex Kills (LifeSiteNews.com)  "In light of the irrefutable medical facts, it should be considered criminally reckless for educators to teach children that homosexual conduct is a normal, safe and perfectly acceptable alternative form of sexual expression (or "sexual orientation")." ..... "Children are impressionable.  Their young minds are fresh clay ready for molding, and these adult homosexual activists know it.  Your child's spiritual, emotional and physical well-being belongs in your hands, not in the hands of liberal activists and elitist educators with a deceptive and destructive political agenda."                                   Read it here.
- National Post  "...the Stephen Boissoin case is an egregious assault on religious liberty, press freedom and freedom of speech. And for those of us who previously underestimated the threat to religious liberty, it serves as a rude correction.."                                          Read it here.
- Catholic Light Article & Audio interview with Pete Vere.  Parts  1    2    3    4 .

"Stephen struck me as anything but hateful. He came across as gentle, albeit fervent like most evangelicals (although he doesn't admit the label, calling himself a simple Bible Christian). Moreover, he expressed genuinely felt concern for the emotional, spiritual and physical welfare of those who practice the homosexual lifestyle."  Pete Vere, Catholic Light


Medical Consequences of What Homosexuals Do

Throughout history, the major civilizations and major religions condemned homosexuality. Until 1961 homosexual acts were illegal throughout America.  (1969 in Canada)

Gays claim that the "prevailing attitude toward homosexuals in the U.S. and many other countries is revulsion and hostility....for acts and desires not harmful to anyone." The American Psychological Association and the American Public Health Association assured the U.S. Supreme Court in 1986 that "no significant data show that engaging in...oral and anal sex, results in mental or physical dysfunction."

Click here to read this pamphlet


British Columbia Parents and Teachers for Life Website

Opposing the Pro-Homosexuality Agenda Page

In regards to the recent absurd ruling by the AHRC, let me be clear, I will never apologize regardless of the consequences and I will not pay fines unless failing to do so prevents my ability to appeal.  I stand by my right to have an opinion and to equally express that opinon in private and in the public square.  I will exercise that God given right as long as I live.

All across Canada, Pastors, Priests, Christian Teachers and private citizens that vocalize their disagreement with the pro-gay social engineering of our society, are being brought before various forms of Kangaroo Courts.  These morally liberal activists are opposed to our Constitutional freedoms of speech and religion.  They  persecute us for our opposing beliefs and for speaking out against their agenda.   As one journalist put it, their rallying cry is, “If I hate what you say, I’ll accuse you of hate.”  This agenda is attempting to manipulate and deceive society into accepting homosexuality, pro-gay school curriculums that omit any balanced opinion, gay marriage, gay adoption etc, as if these were normal behaviours.  THEY ARE NOT!!!  They are attemtping to slience any opposition to their agenda by deeming it hateful, fanatical, homophobic, bigoted.  Those that have the courage to voice opposition, no matter how qualified, are targeted for re-education, persecution and prosecution. 

If you are reading this and think that this is alarmist, then I simply ask you this: how bad do things have to become before you will get involved? It's time to start taking back what the enemy has taken from you. The safety and future of our children is at stake. 
Excerpt from my 2002 letter to the editor.

I stand by my 2002 letter to the editor and how it was worded.  It is more true today then when published.  I am encouraged to see the truth it proclaimed vindicated by the very persecution that I have faced by the hands of those I exposed in that letter.  I am further encouraged to see Canadians and Americans waking up from their slumber determined to defend their freedom and profess what they BELIEVE!

I publicly declare that I do not hate homosexuals and further declare that I love God and regardless how I too stumble through this life, I believe that His teachings are true, relevant and worthy of proclamation, regardless of the consequences.

As hard as this persecution has been "I publicly praise God for giving me the convictions that put me in this troubling position." I would rather be here and suffering tenfold worse than to be one that does not know or trust in Him!!!

To all who pray for me, for us and support our freedom, thank-you and blessings to you all.

Stephen Boissoin


Conflict of Interest

There is nothing democratic about human rights commissions.  They can be better described as a " Supreme Conflict of Interest."

Consider:  The Alberta Human Rights Commission hands out tax dollars in the form of public grants to promote very controversial social issues and at the same time they have the authority to rule on speech and punish opinion via their tribunals.  This same applies in every Province.

The Alberta Human Rights Commission offers grants that pertain to diversity, equality and anti-discrimination etc.  These grants are made possible via our tax dollars.  Before Darren Lund filed his complaint to the AHRC against me, the AHRC approved a grant on behalf of the Alberta P-FLAG (Parents Families & Friends of Lesbians and Gays) Faith Society.  I discovered this grant on the AHRC website back in 2002 before I submitted my letter.  The online documentation that described the mandate of Alberta P-FLAG made it clear that it had an initiative to promote that homosexuality was "normal, necessary, acceptable and productive and has been for thousands of years" to school children and youth.  This same AHRC that approved this grant for Alberta P-Flag's hyper pro-gay agenda is the same organization that headed up the prosecution against me and ruled on behalf of pro-gay activist Darren Lund.  Considering that the AHRC approved funds for this very controversial initiative, how can they claim and expect anyone to believe that I was provided with an unbiassed hearing and especially, ruling?   This alone speaks volumes about the injustice done to me and the illegal activity of these quasi-judicial commissions.  What other legal body in Canada doles out grant money for controversial social issues and has the authority to rule on such important matters of constitutional law at the same time?

Stephen Boissoin

Webmail